Thursday, June 20, 2013
User: Pass: | Forgot Pass? | Create FREE Account

…do you think it's good or bad pork?

SOTU Response: Just A Speech

Posted by BA Team On January - 24 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

For Immediate Release:
January 24 2012

Media Contact:
Kate Pomeroy (703) 927-7111
Victoria Coley (443) 758-6077
Press@thepublicnotice.org    

State of the Union Just A Speech

Time For Talking Has Ended And Time For Action Has Long Passed

Arlington, VA – Tonight, President Barack Obama delivered his third State of the Union address. Addressing a joint session and millions of television viewers, the president outlined his vision for fixing the country and improving our economy.

Gretchen Hamel, Executive Director of Public Notice, said the following:

“Tonight, President Obama offered skilled showmanship and expert oratory as he addressed the state of our union. We have grown accustomed to the pomp and posturing associated with this speech as have millions of Americans. And certainly in times of prosperity, we can enjoy the ceremonial nature of the affair, but this is not one of those moments.

“Our nation finds itself on the path to fiscal ruin with a $15 trillion dollar debt and entitlement programs that cannot be adequately financed. We have heard promises before. We have been told by the nation’s chief executives in the past that they would rein in the out-of-control spending. It has not happened. The American people have been misled.

“While the President’s speech certainly used many of the right words, he will be graded on his actions and nothing more. The time for talking has ended. The time for action has long passed. This administration and Congress must lead by example and get our nation’s fiscal house in order or concede to the American people they have failed the leadership test.

“While President Obama’s words tonight are encouraging, they will be measured against his performance, and as Americans, we can only hope his track record and that of Congress’ begins to reflect the fiscal realities we face as a nation.”

View SOTU Web Video: Stop the Rhetoric, It’s Time to Act
View National Poll: Americans doubtful SOTU will reveal new solutions

Public Notice is an independent, nonpartisan, non-profit, 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to providing facts and insight on the effects public policy has on Americans’ financial well being.

###

Another year. Another speech. Rhetoric. Plans. Promises. For decades presidents have called on Washington to exercise fiscal responsibility. Yet lack of action has left America with a debt that threatens the economy and the credit rating of our nation. It is time to end empty rhetoric and enact meaningful change. Our latest video calls out Presidents of all political stripes on their empty promises. Click here to view the accompanying fact sheet.

State of the Union: a history & what to expect

Posted by BA Team On January - 24 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

The Constitution of the United States requires the president “from time to time give to the Congress information on the State of the Union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.” Today, the president will address a joint session of Congress to speak on the state of the union. Click here to learn about the history of the State of the Union address and what to expect and listen for in this year’s speech.

VIDEO: Stop the rhetoric. It’s time to act.

Posted by BA Team On January - 24 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

As we mentioned yesterday, the State of the Union, intended to be a hopeful look into the future, seems to have become more of a venue to deliver empty promises. At least when it comes to addressing the federal government’s spending problem and, ultimately, our national debt.

For generations, from Republican and Democratic presidents, we’ve heard well-intentioned plans to control the nation’s fiscal imbalances. And we still find ourselves over $15 trillion in debt. Only by reining in overspending can we begin to address the debt burden that is putting an economic recovery in jeopardy.  It’s past time for bold spending reforms.

Our latest video calls out Presidents of both parties.

For more on empty promises in past State of the Union addresses check out our latest fact sheet here.

Public Pulse: how strong is the economic recovery?

Posted by BA Team On January - 24 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

According to ABC/Washington Post, 21% of adults think the economic recovery has been a strong one while 77% think it has been a weak recovery.


According to Gallup, 29% of adults are satisfied with the size and power of the federal government. 69% are unsatisfied.


According to Fox News, 34% of registered voters think the next generation will have a better life than the current one. 53% think they will have a worse life; 4% say their lives will be about the same; and 9% are unsure.


B.A. Spending Daily

Posted by BA Team On January - 24 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

Here’s a roundup of this morning’s must-read budget and economic stories:

Politico, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post preview President Obama’s State of the Union address, to be given tonight.

Politico takes a look at the upcoming fights in Congress.

The Hill reports one House Republican leader wants to roll back the automatic defense cuts that will begin in 2013.

Politico says President Obama was warned about the increasing national debt before he took office.

Stop the Rhetoric, It’s Time to Act (Video Text)

Posted by BA Team On January - 24 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

View press release HERE
Watch web video: Stop the Rhetoric, It’s Time to Act

Text: Another Year. Another Speech. Rhetoric. Plans. Promises. And Now. A Country on the verge of Bankruptcy.

Reagan: Our national debt is approaching one trillion dollars. A few weeks ago I called such a figure—a trillion dollars—incomprehensible. (Text with audio: 1981, $1 Trillion, Incomprehensible)
Reagan: I will recommend a federal spending freeze. (Text with audio: 1983)

Bush senior: To work day and night. If that’s what it takes to meet the budget targets and to produce a budget on time. (Text with audio: 1989, meet the budget targets)

Clinton: But in the end we have to get back to the deficit. For years there’s been a lot of talk about it but very few credible efforts to deal with it. (Text with audio: 1993, deficit, very few credible efforts)

Bush: Many of you have talked about the need to pay down our national debt. I listened, and I agree. (Text with audio: 2001, pay down our national debt)

Obama: We are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. (Text with audio: 2010, freeze government spending)
Obama: I am proposing that, starting this year, we freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years. (Text with audio: 2011, freeze annual domestic spending)

Repeat of Reagan: Our national debt is approaching $1 trillion dollars. A few weeks ago I called such a figure—a trillion dollars—incomprehensible. (Text with audio: $1 Trillion incomprehensible)

Text: America’s debt today: $15 trillion. Stop the rhetoric. Stop the empty promises. Cut the spending. It’s time to act. Stop pushing America to the verge of bankruptcy.

New Web Video: Stop The Rhetoric, It’s time To Act

Posted by BA Team On January - 24 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

For Immediate Release:
January 24 2012

Media Contact:
Kate Pomeroy (703) 927-7111
Victoria Coley (443) 758-6077
Press@thepublicnotice.org    

NEW WEB VIDEO: STOP THE RHETORIC, IT’S TIME TO ACT

It Is Time To End Empty Rhetoric & Enact Meaningful Change

Arlington, VA – Just in time for the State of the Union address, Bankrupting America releases a new web video that shows 3 decades of State of the Union presidential promises of fiscal discipline. Sadly, the promises we heard in the 80’s, 90’s, and 00’s are very similar to the same we hear today.

Watch Video 

Run Time: 1:22
View video script click HERE
View fact sheet click HERE

Additional: National Poll Americans doubtful SOTU will reveal new solutions

Public Notice is an independent, nonpartisan, non-profit, 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to providing facts and insight on the effects public policy has on Americans’ financial well being. 

###

Real leadership won’t be found in a speech

Posted by BA Team On January - 23 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

This OpEd by Gretchen Hamel as seen in The Daily Caller

Real leadership won’t be found in a speech
By Gretchen Hamel 

As a political junkie, I’ll admit it: I love the president’s annual State of the Union speeches, regardless of who’s in the White House.

Every year, I’m inspired by the ceremonial nature of the evening, as members of Congress, cabinet secretaries and Supreme Court justices gather together in a spirit of congeniality to honor one of our republic’s great traditions.

And naturally, no State of the Union address is complete without a little political posturing on both sides: During President Clinton’s speeches, Democrats were always poised to cheer and applaud, while Republicans would sit on their hands; a few years later, during the Bush presidency, those roles were reversed.

Of course, the substance of the speeches is always another story — a president and his staff view the State of the Union address as a laundry list of grand ideas that will serve as the foundation of their historical legacy. Most of the time, those “grand ideas” amount to empty promises that will never be kept.

As President Obama takes to the chamber Tuesday to deliver his 2012 State of the Union address, we’d do well to remember that much of what is promised will never come to pass.

Consider this: In 2002, President Bush promised that winning the war on terror, protecting the homeland and kick-starting the economy would require a “deficit that will be small and short term, so long as Congress restrains spending and acts in a fiscally responsible manner.”

In fact, President Bush called for restraint in spending and fiscal discipline in each of his State of the Union speeches, a fact that was apparently lost on Congress and the rest of his administration. By the end of the Bush presidency, the federal budget deficit and debt burden were the largest in history.

After Bush left office and President Obama took the podium, the new president also spoke of the virtues of fiscal responsibility and more responsible government. “Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t,” President Obama declared in 2010. “We will continue to go through the budget, line by line, page by page, to eliminate programs that we can’t afford and don’t work.”

So far, the Obama administration has identified precious few of these unaffordable and unworkable programs to be eliminated — our ballooning debt ($15 trillion and growing) and massive deficits ($1.3 trillion for the last fiscal year) are a testament to the dangers of runaway government spending.

It would be nice if the president were to break the pattern and use the occasion of the State of the Union to level with the American people and Congress. He could admit that budget reform and lower spending are an absolute necessity — and then meet that challenge with a budget plan for the coming year that brings spending to heel.

He could emphasize that without serious reform to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and defense spending, the nation faces an unsustainable fiscal future — and then follow that point with real action to lead the way on reform. And he could illustrate how getting the debt and deficit under control would help to reduce the government’s hold on the economy, thereby allowing for economic growth and job creation.

Would the American people welcome that kind of straight talk? I believe they would. According to recent polling conducted on behalf of Public Notice, the organization I head, voters would like to hear the president focus more on jobs and the economy, rather than additional spending.

Meanwhile, more than half — 56 percent — believe the federal government does more to hurt than help the economy, and they’d like less intervention when it comes to spending and regulations.

The fact is, meaningful change in the way our nation does business is simply not going to be found in any presidential speech or proclamation. True change will require real courage and vision, with our nation’s leaders working together to get real results.

So when the president speaks on Tuesday, let’s all enjoy the pomp and circumstance, and let’s celebrate the fact that we share a common history and common values as Americans, and let’s appreciate an evening of civil discourse and, yes, even disagreement. But just remember that what he promises in that laundry list of a speech is mostly empty promises.

And the opportunity for real leadership will have to wait for another day.

Gretchen Hamel is executive director of Public Notice, an independent, nonpartisan, non-profit dedicated to providing facts and insight on the economy and how government policy affects Americans’ financial well-being.

I Finally Understand Democrats

Posted by Adam On January - 23 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

After years of puzzlement and curiosity observing modern day Democrats, I think I have finally figured them out.

I’m constantly amazed that modern Democrats have evolved beyond living in caves.  I mean what other animal on this planet can disregard all common sense and logic and survive?  Scientists have recently discovered that even giant sea slugs that do not possess a brain as such can learn from past experiences.  That puts them a leg up over the current crop of liberals in this country.   I used to subscribe to the adage that liberalism was a mental disorder, but even Rainman would have a hard time buying into the standard mantra of the present day Democratic Party. In order to believe that Democrats have the answer today, you would have to believe:

That you can grow the entitlement class beyond the taxpayer class and never hit critical mass where there is no money left.

That using the military to oust a murderous thug dictator in 2003 was criminal, and using the military to oust a murderous thug dictator in 2011 was noble.

That the best way to grow the wealth of the private sector is to take all the money out of it.

That the best way to make us energy independent is to block any effort to produce more petrocarbons in this country.

That the best way to create jobs is to increase taxes and regulations on the job creators.

That the best way to stop arms from this country from getting into the hands of the drug cartels in Mexico is to provide arms to the drug cartels in Mexico.

That all the ills of the economy are due to the fat cat banks and other corporations, and the best way to deal with that is to provide billions in bailouts to the fat cat banks and other corporations.

That more unemployment checks create more jobs.

That investigating the background of George W Bush to the point that you have color photographs of his colon is proper vetting of the Chief Executive, but asking for Barack Hussein Obama’s college records or for information on his association with a known terrorist is racist.

That somehow making firearms illegal will prevent criminals from using them.

That the life of a murderer on death row is sacred, but an unborn baby’s is not.

That the best way to overcome our racist past is to enforce racist affirmative action policies.

That people who are too ignorant to get a free state issued I.D. card are smart enough to vote.

That the best way to overcome our current spending crisis is to spend more money.

That the federal government with no competition can provide a better health care product than the private sector with competition can.

That a grandma in a wheelchair is a bigger potential threat on an airplane than a guy with a name that takes phlegm to pronounce.

That we need to be sensitive to the feelings of people that subscribe to a religion that teaches that we all should submit to their version of righteousness or face beheading, but should demean and diminish those that believe in the religion that teaches we should love and embrace our neighbors no matter what religion they belong to.

That poll watchers who want to ensure that election laws are observed and the vote is without fraud are intimidating voters, and black radicals with clubs in front of a polling place are not.

That ice ages and the warming periods in between were not caused by man’s influence on the earth but a half degree rise in average temperatures over 30 years is.

That using the equivalent of two gallons of fossil fuel to produce one gallon of ethanol makes sense because it is “renewable.”

That a picture of a female guard in Abu Ghraib pointing at the genitals of a terrorist and laughing is deplorable but those same goofballs setting off an IED and killing our troops are just freedom fighters.

That a 70 year old woman with a Gadsden flag is a radical but an OWS protestor that defecates on a police car and breaks windows of businesses is a frustrated citizen.

That in spite of the fact that one third of the world is hungry it makes more sense to use food for fuel than drilling for a fuel source that nobody can eat.

The simple fact is that Democrats are the Dodo birds of the human race.  The Dodo was discovered by Portuguese explorers in the late 1500′s.  The name comes from the Portuguese word “Doudo” which means simpleton.  They called this bird a simpleton because in their minds it lacked any common sense whatsoever.  That lack of common sense or survival instinct eventually led to its demise as a species.

Wait a minute, that’s not really fair of me, I shouldn’t equate Democrats to a simple minded flightless bird that was too stupid to run from predators.  The Dodo had a job foraging for food.

MEMORANDUM

DATE: JANUARY 23, 2012

TO: PUBLIC NOTICE
FROM: THE TARRANCE GROUP
RE: KEY FINDINGS FROM NATIONAL SURVEY

The Tarrance Group is pleased to present Public Notice with the key findings from a survey of N=805 registered “likely” voters across the country. Interviews were conducted January 15-19, 2012. In 95 out of 100 cases, the margin of error on a sample of this type is +/- 3.5%.

KEY FINDINGS

- As President Barack Obama prepares to deliver his next State of the Union address, new polling shows voters believe his speech should focus on economic issues, yet voters are doubtful that President Obama will reveal new solutions to the nation’s economic problems. When provided with a list of topics, a majority says the most important topic for the speech is jobs (23%), the economy (20%) and government spending (14%). Of less importance to voters are issues like health care costs (6%), education (6%), government reform (5%), energy (3%), and taxes (2%).

- This concern over the economy is in the context of voters also believing that the federal government hurts (56%) rather than helps (34%) economic growth, and that the economy is extremely/very impacted by the federal debt (66%). At the same time, voters show no desire to add new regulations to businesses, as a mere 21% say businesses need more federal government regulation (46% say less are needed and 27% say the level should stay the same).

- While a majority (62%) are extremely or very interested in the State of the Union address, a majority (52%) say he is likely to propose the same type of solutions, while just over one third (38%) say he is likely to propose new solutions.

- President Obama’s State of the Union address comes at a time when the American electorate is deeply divided on several fundamental values underlying public policy and politics. This is likely a key reason Congress has switched from Republican to Democratic control, and back to Republican control, in recent years.

- First, a look at where voters are divided:

Generic Congressional ballot: 41% support the Republican candidate for Congress, while 43% support the Democrat. 16% are undecided.

- Presidential ballot: While the general election field is not yet established, the “Republican nominee” receives 45% of the vote, while President Obama receives 43%.

- Views of Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party: While fewer Americans are familiar with Occupy Wall Street, a plurality of voters have an unfavorable view of both movements (46%).

- Future of the next generation: 43% believe the next generation will realize the American dream, while 44% believe they will not.

- Federal government’s impact on me: 43% say the federal government helps their quality of life, while 42% say it hurts their quality of life.

- Control of government: While not a perfect split, many voters are unaware who controls the federal government, with 41% saying the Democratic Party and 35% saying the Republican Party.

- What is striking in the results is the large number of basic areas where Americans are virtually split down the middle. However, not all groups are divided. On nearly every issue on the previous page, Independents, in contrast to committed partisans, are the only group that is consistently in the middle. Below are a few examples that highlight this trend:

- Generic Congressional ballot: 90% of Republicans support their party’s candidate, 93% of Democrats support their candidate, but Independents are split between the two — 35% for the Republican, 31% for the Democrat, and 34% undecided.

- Presidential ballot: While 93% of Republicans support the GOP nominee and 88% of Democrats support President Obama, Independents are divided – 40% support the Republican and 35% support President Obama.

- Views of Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party: While 71% of Republicans have an unfavorable view of Occupy Wall Street and 73% of Democrats have an unfavorable view of the Tea Party, an equal 45% of Independents have an unfavorable view of each movement.

- At the same time that voters are divided on many key issues, there are two key areas where they find agreement. First, two-thirds (66%) of voters say the country is on the wrong track, while only 28% say things are moving in the right direction. Roughly three-quarters of Independents (73%) say things are on the wrong track.

Second, 59% prefer that their Member of Congress compromise so that more things will get done, while 31% prefer their Member press hard for principles he or she believes in even if that means some things won’t get done. A majority (56%) of Independents prefer that their Member compromise.

###

Click here to download the memo.

A look at tomorrow’s State of the Union address

Posted by BA Team On January - 23 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

Tomorrow, the President will deliver his annual State of the Union address. Frankly, regardless of the speaker, these always come off as a lot of campaign speeches do – big promises that have what sounds like great ideas, but don’t fully take into account the political and economic reality that the country faces. How many times have we heard promises of fiscal responsibility? And how far have we gotten on that front?

All the same, Americans will turn their ears to the House chamber tomorrow for a glimpse of the President’s blueprint for the coming years. So what do the experts think he’ll cover? Not surprisingly, most key points revolve around economic issues.

The Associated Press offers, “He is expected to announce ideas to make college more affordable and to address the housing crisis still hampering the economy three years into his term… Obama will also propose fresh ideas to ensure that the wealthy pay more in taxes, reiterating what he considers a matter of basic fairness…”

The New York Times reports that, “In a video preview e-mailed to millions of supporters on Saturday…Mr. Obama promised a populist ‘blueprint for an American economy that’s built to last,’ with the government assisting the private sector and individuals to ensure ‘an America where everybody gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share and everybody plays by the same set of rules.’”

The Hill explains, “Obama will shift the focus away from budgets and deficit cutting, which dominated 2011, to job creation and the economy.” The Hill also covers what probably won’t make it in the speech – tax reform. “[S]ome tax analysts say they expect the idea of a broad overhaul of the tax code to get at most a passage or two in Tuesday’s State of the Union.”

But what do Americans really want to hear? What are they most concerned about? A new Public Notice poll found out. While the President will probably lay out a plan with the federal government as a key player in a recovery, most voters believe that the federal government hurts (56%) rather than helps (34%) economic growth. Furthermore, voters show no desire to add new regulations to businesses, as a mere 21% say businesses need more federal government regulation. The results also reveal a public skeptical of Washington’s ability to develop new solutions to our unique problems. A majority (52%) say the President is likely to propose the same type of solutions, while just over one third (38%) say he is likely to propose new solutions.

It’s important that the Washington consider the concerns of everyday Americans as they look for ways to get the economy growing again. It’s become all too apparent that continuing to spend simply has not spurred a recovery – in fact, being a deterrent to growth. It’s past time for bold spending reform.

Members of the Occupy Wall Street movement urinated on a cross, desecrated a church and threw Bibles at police officers in separate incidents over the weekend.

FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK!

Protesters in San Francisco occupied an abandoned hotel and began attacking police – hurling bricks and Bibles at officers.

“Once they gained access [to the hotel], some of them made it to the top of the roof and they began to throw Bibles down at the officers,” San Francisco Police Dept. spokesman Carlos Manfredi told ABC News.

Several officers were injured in the attack.

In New York City, Occupy protesters allegedly urinated on a cross inside a Brooklyn church.

“An occupier peed inside the building and the pee came into contact with a cross,” wrote Rabbi Chaim Gruber in a note to the New York Post.

The Occupy Wall Street movement has a history of participants urinating and defecating in public.

The group has also been accused of desecrating West Park Presbyterian Church. The pastor ordered 60 protesters to leave the sanctuary after someone stole a bronze lid from the $12,500 baptismal font.

“It was like pissing on the 99 percent,” an angry Rev. Bob Brashear told the New York Post.

The pastor supports the Occupy movement – but is outraged over their behavior.

“Even in the 1980s when we had a lot of crack addicts etc. in the neighborhood, and even robbing people in the church, that particular religious symbol had never really been disturbed before,” the pastor told CBS News. “I tried to make it clear that I don’t believe in collective punishment but I do believe in collective accountability and responsibility.”

The House and the Senate were back from their long holiday vacation last week. It was a very quiet week though, in anticipation of this week’s State of the Union address. The House passed a symbolic disapproval of the President’s request to increase the debt ceiling (under an agreement passed last summer, this is the third and final debt ceiling increase that will go into effect without Congress’s express approval) – otherwise there was no action on either floor.

For more information on what will be coming up in the second session of the 112th Congress, check out our blog post here. Money’s Worth will have all the details of the votes on these measures as they come up this year.

What you paid
Last week taxpayers spent roughly $100 million on Congress.

Salaries of Members of Congress and their allowances/week:

Speaker of the House: $223,500/52 = $4,299

House and Senate Majority and Minority Leaders: ($193,400/52) x 4 = $14,877

Other Representatives and Senators: ($174,000/52) x 530 = $1,773,462

Average weekly budget for all House offices: ($1,446,009/52) x 435 = $2,096,421

Average weekly budget for all Senate offices: ($3,409,093/52) x 100 = $6,555,958

Non-salary money allocated for Congress: $4.656 billion/52 = $89,538,462

What you got
The House
did not pass any legislation other than the debt ceiling disapproval.

The Senate did not hold any votes.


Top 3: last week’s most popular posts

Posted by BA Team On January - 23 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

B.A. Spending Daily

Posted by BA Team On January - 23 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

Here’s a roundup of this morning’s must-read budget and economic stories:

The Associated Press, The Hill, The New York Times, Politico and The Washington Post all preview President Obama’s State of the Union address, to be delivered tomorrow.

Reuters says the Pentagon is unwilling to cut its fleet of aircraft carriers in order to reduce the budget deficit.

Politico examines the state of the debate over extending the 2011 payroll tax cut for another year.

Politico says the House may take up a Medicare reform proposal this year while The Hill reports President Obama may take a different approach to health care this year.

Bloomberg says it’s likely U.S. economic growth picked up at the end of last year. The Associated Press says the pickup might continue into 2012.

A new Gallup survey finds Americans are unhappy with the economy and the size and scope of the federal government.

For Immediate Release:
January 23 2012

Media Contact:
Kate Pomeroy (703) 927-7111
Victoria Coley (443) 758-6077
Press@thepublicnotice.org     

NEW POLL: AMERICANS DOUBTFUL SOTU WILL REVEAL NEW SOLUTIONS
Majority Of Voters Believe Government Spending Hurts Economic Growth

Arlington, VA – Just one day before President Obama will deliver his third State of the Union Address, a new poll sponsored by Public Notice and conducted by The Tarrance Group, reveals that the majority of voters believe the President’s focus should be on the economy and government spending.

Gretchen Hamel, Executive Director of Public Notice, stated the following:

“Americans are very frustrated.  They are equally as pessimistic.  And they know that government isn’t going to solve the country’s problems, in fact, 56 % think our government is making things worse.  What can government do?  A clear majority want their Member of Congress to compromise in order to get more done.

“Policymakers should take these findings seriously and recognize that Americans want real leadership coming out of Washington, which means less government regulations and fiscal restraint as opposed to the partisan rancor which has led us to this point and negatively impacted the nation’s economy.”

Key Findings:
To view the complete poll, click here.

- Voters want Washington to focus on the economy and government spending. When given a list of potential topics, 23 percent of respondents said they want President Obama to focus on jobs in his State of the Union address Tuesday. Twenty percent said they want the president to focus on the economy in general while 14 percent said he should focus on government spending.

- Voters see a connection between government spending and the economy. And it is not a positive connection. Fifty-fix percent of voters believe the federal government hurts the economy. Only 34 percent believe it helps. Furthermore, 66 percent of voters said the economy is extremely/very impacted by the federal debt.

- Voters want less government intervention. Only 21 percent of voters said businesses need more federal government regulation. Nearly half – 46 percent – say regulations on businesses should be reduced while 27 percent said  the level should stay the same.

- Americans are divided on the future of the country. Forty-three percent of voters believe the next generation will achieve the American dream. Slightly more – 44 percent – believe it will not. In the near term, 66 percent of voters said the country is on the wrong track; 28 percent said it is one the right track.

- Americans don’t want partisanship. Fifty-nine percent of voters said they would prefer that their Member of Congress compromise so that more things will get done in Washington.

This survey was conducted January 15-19, 2012 and the results noted above are from 805 registered “likely” voters across the country. In 95 out of 100 cases, the margin of error on a sample of this type is +/- 3.5%.

Public Notice is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit, 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to providing the facts and insights on the effects public policy has on Americans’ financial well being.

###

Monthly Snapshot: spending & the economy

Posted by BA Team On January - 20 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

Every month we put together a snapshot of federal spending and the economy as a go to resource for top line numbers when we need them quickly. Often on the blog we go into more depth on these numbers as the latest figure is released – unemployment, deficit, etc.

We thought this would be a good resource for our audience to have as well. After all, knowledge is power. Plus, this makes our job a little easier – it’s hard to deny the government is overspending and that overspending has serious consequences when the numbers make that all too clear. Click here to download your own copy.

Friday Funnies: 5 jokes about the economy

Posted by BA Team On January - 20 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

5

“According to a Washington Post poll, 84 percent of Americans do not approve of the way Congress is doing its job. Sixteen percent weren’t even aware Congress is doing a job.” – Jay Leno

4

“President Obama is visiting Disney World on Thursday to promote a new plan to boost tourism…Obama doesn’t pay admission to Disney World. He just charges it to the China section of Epcot.” – Jimmy Fallon

3

“Romney defends his 15% taxes: ‘I’m basically giving the government a really nice tip.’” – Andy Borowitz

2

Cartoon: Who will catch it next?

1

“Researchers found a frog in New Guinea that is so tiny, they believe it’s the smallest vertebrate on the planet. It has the tiniest backbone of any living creature, except members of Congress.” – Jay Leno

B.A. Spending Daily

Posted by BA Team On January - 20 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

Here’s a roundup of this morning’s must-read budget and economic stories:

Politico asks whether the 112th Congress is the worst ever.

The Associated Press reports that in his upcoming fiscal year 2013 budget outline, to be released in February, President Obama will call on Congress to reconsider the $1.2 trillion in deficit cuts considered by the debt supercommittee.

Some positive economic news and some negative: Bloomberg reports weekly jobless claims are at their lowest point in four years but also reports housing starts are down 4.1 percent.

Bloomberg reports the Defense Department is considering ending a $6.8 billion missile program.

Top Ten Union Corruption Stories of the Year

Posted by Adam On January - 20 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS
Unions for many years have been a highly reliable segment of the Democratic Party Left. Yet this perhaps no more was this true than in 2011 – and with good reason. The year began with the Republicans holding a nearly 50-seat edge in the House of Representatives following the GOP’s smashing wins in the November 2010 midterm elections. Avoiding legislative process became a top priority for organized labor. Union officials and organizers at every opportunity created and exploited populist rage toward the wealthy, now redubbed “the 1 percent,” playing a key role in shutting down the Wisconsin State Capitol, organizing Occupy Wall Street protests, and conducting corporate harassment campaigns. Taking the high road, unions also heavily relied on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to enact what amounted to stealth legislation. In the NLRB, at least, unions had a true ally. By law, the normally five-member NLRB must consist of three members of one major party and two of the other. With Barack Obama in the White House, Democrats now provided the tiebreaker vote. The president’s recess appointments in March 2010 of two party members, Craig Becker and Mark Pearce, both experienced union lawyers, paid off handsomely last year. This past April the board filed a complaint against Boeing Co., claiming the company had deprived an International Association of Machinists local in Washington State of its right to strike when it located a second production line for a new jumbo jet to South Carolina, a Right to Work state. The board effectively sent a message to unionized manufacturers that they must subject key expansion decisions to union veto power. Every union, not just the IAM, stood to gain. And in the end, they did. The NLRB dropped the suit in December, providing Boeing with a nominal victory, but only after the Machinists had worked out a favorable contract extension with the company several days earlier.

The NLRB, meanwhile, unveiled a new rule in June to reduce drastically the time elapse between a union filing for representation petition and workers voting on whether to unionize. The board finalized the regulation in December in the face of intense House GOP opposition, thus assuring (for now) that employers will have little time to oppose a union organizing campaign. And the NLRB ruling by 3 to 1 in UNICCO Service Co. made it more difficult for an employer taking over a unionized company to avoid recognition of the union as a bargaining agent (i.e., the “successor bar”).

The board invited scrutiny in other ways. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, in September wrote Becker on what role he played, if any, in preparing an anti-corporate organizing manual for the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) where he formerly served as associate general counsel. The SEIU found this manual highly useful in its more than year-long campaign to destroy the brand name of Sodexo, which eventually, this March, countered with a racketeering suit against the SEIU. Sen. Hatch’s request might seem moot in the aftermath of President Obama’s withdrawal of his nomination in December of Becker for a full term on the board. But the president, faced with another protracted period with a nonfunctioning two-member board, only days ago appointed Left-leaning Democrats Sharon Block and Richard Griffin, along with the obligatory second Republican, Terence Flynn, to the board during a Senate “recess” of dubious constitutionality.

The Service Employees revealed themselves once more to be masters of political agitprop. Not only did the union engage in an intimidation campaign against Sodexo, it also played a central role in fomenting Occupy Wall Street and offshoot campaigns. Moreover, as reported in February, two of the Midwest residences raided by the FBI in September 2010 for possible linkages to the terrorist groups Hamas (Gaza and the West Bank) and FARC (Colombia) belonged, respectively, to a current and former official of Chicago-based SEIU Local 73, Joe Iosbaker and Tom Burke. Iosbaker, at least, is back in the news. He and another FBI suspect, Andy Thayer, helped lead Occupy Chicago protests in October. And a longtime prominent SEIU organizer, Stephen Lerner, not only was active in the Occupy movement, but earlier in the year laid out an economic destabilization plan – caught on tape during a speech in New York – to decimate America’s banks and corporations. Lerner, several times a visitor to the Obama White House, has been all over the map since, identifying and denouncing “billionaires” at whom activists could vent their wrath.

Other unions flexed their muscles at the perfidious “1 percent.” AFL-CIO-affiliated labor federations in Boston, Chicago and Orange County, Calif., for instance, organized “Occupy” protests. Along with the SEIU, the Amalgamated Transit Union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the Communications Workers of America, AFSCME and the New York State United Teachers each endorsed Occupy Wall Street squatters. Even AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka paid the Wall Street occupiers a friendly personal visit. Trumka had plenty else to keep him busy, most notably, a fledgling “Super PAC” to raise money for progressive candidates in 2012. He’ll have plenty of allies in Wisconsin, where public employees unions spearheaded a three-week mass takeover of the State Capitol in Madison and surrounding grounds starting in mid-February. Supportive Democratic state senators fled town in unison with the intention of preventing a quorum for a vote on GOP Governor Scott Walker’s budget, a large portion of which contained proposals to curtail union collective bargaining authority. They lost – temporarily. After the AWOL senators returned home to a hero’s welcome, the GOP-majority legislature passed the bill and the Wisconsin Supreme Court in June, by a 4-3 margin, upheld the law, reversing a permanent injunction issued the previous month by a state circuit court. A union-driven recall campaign against certain pro-Walker legislators proved mostly unsuccessful. But activists on November 15 launched a petition drive to recall the governor and are reportedly close to acquiring the minimum required signatures for submission by the January 17 deadline.

Political confrontation wasn’t the whole story in 2011. As usual, union officials and functionaries produced numerous examples of financial impropriety. Among the more dramatic stories: Tim Foley, business manager of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 134 in Chicago, resigned his post in October following revelations that he and three other union officials had been illegally double-dipping into their municipal and union pension plans. The leaders of a United Food and Commercial Workers local in Brooklyn, N.Y. were arrested and charged with shaking down or stealing $2.4 million from employers and members. Screen Actors Guild (SAG) health and pension plan boss Bruce Dow and his cronies faced unexpected scrutiny for the disappearance of possibly $10 million in union benefits. Hundreds of FBI and other law enforcement agents in a single January morning arrested well over 100 Mafia wise guys and associates, mainly in the New York City area, for murder, racketeering, money-laundering, loan-sharking, extortion and other offenses going back some three decades. The FBI in October arrested nearly a dozen persons, including retired union employees of the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR), for conspiring to concoct phony medical histories in order to expand eligibility for outsized pension and “disability” checks, a scheme that over the long term could cost U.S. taxpayers at least $1 billion. And Melissa King, first exposed in late 2009, pleaded guilty to fleecing the New York-area Laborers International Union of North America (LIUNA) “Sandhogs” local where she served as benefits manager, though in an amount less than the alleged sum of more than $40 million.

Taking into account the subjective criteria used in the past for ranking importance, here are the ten corruption/aggression stories, in reverse order, that stood out most in 2011:

10) Chicago Electrical Workers bosses collect lavish pensions and stick city taxpayers with bills. Collecting two pensions, one from an employer and the other from a union, isn’t unknown in organized labor. But sometimes it’s illegal. And Tim Foley, former business manager-financial secretary of IBEW Local 134, along with other officials of the 15,000-member Chicago local, likely broke Illinois law by purchasing credits for a city pension plan to be based on their higher union salary, while falsely claiming they were not participating in any other plan. The city pension credit program itself is a legal scam, potentially costing taxpayers possibly tens of millions of dollars. Foley, under intense media scrutiny, resigned his union post in October.

9) FBI raid nets dozens of New York City-area mobsters and associates. There’s almost nothing like a good mob takedown to keep union bosses honest. A year ago, hundreds of FBI agents, U.S. marshals, and various state and local law enforcement agents fanned out and in single morning arrested nearly 120 Mafia members and associates named in a lengthy indictment for murder, racketeering, extortion and other acts committed over three decades, mainly in and around New York City. The raids netted wise guys of all five New York Mafia families, especially the Colombos. Equally significantly, many of the crimes centered upon three New York-area unions with a reputation for being mobbed-up: the Laborers-affiliated Cement and Concrete Workers Local 6A; Teamsters Local 282; and International Longshoremen’s Association Local 1235.

8) United Food and Commercial Workers officials in Brooklyn charged with massive extortion, fraud. Extracting payments from employers and stealing from member benefit plans came easy to the leaders of UFCW Local 348 in Brooklyn. It helped that the leaders of the racket were family. A six-count federal indictment handed down in October ended the decade and a half run of Anthony Fazio Sr., Anthony Fazio Jr. and John Fazio. Arrested and charged with racketeering, extortion, money-laundering and other offenses, the Fazios allegedly pocketed $2.4 million in coerced employer “donations” and fake invoices paid out of local accounts.

7) Organized labor foments, endorses Occupy Wall Street protests. Time magazine named “The Protestor” as its Person of the Year for 2011. And no protesters, at least in the West, made a bigger impact than those taking part in Occupy Wall Street and similar Left-populist appropriations of public space. While spokesmen for these outpourings of anti-capitalist street theater may pride themselves on their leaderless resistance, the reality is that unions have been more than ephemeral players. The Amalgamated Transit Union, the Teamsters, AFSCME and the SEIU each publicly endorsed the demonstrators, while AFL-CIO area labor councils made protests possible in any number of cities. SEIU revolutionary organizer Stephen Lerner appears to have a prime mover in Chicago and elsewhere. Belated municipal crackdowns, cold weather and no doubt a certain amount of tedium have forced most occupiers indoors for now, but the movement they birthed will be here for years to come if unions have any say in it.

6) Unions were major recipients of waivers from Obama health care law they lobbied to create. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, better known as “Obamacare,” promised better and more affordable health care to a wider range of Americans when it was enacted in March 2010. Yet few people want to pay for the law’s mandates, including – ironically – organizations, such as labor unions, that lobbied for the law. By last spring, the Department of Health and Human Services had awarded nearly 1,400 waivers to various group health plans from a requirement forcing sponsors to offer at least $750,000 in coverage per enrollee in 2011, a figure set to rise even higher until its phase-out in 2014. About a fourth of the waivers went to union- or unionized employer-sponsored plans representing about half of all covered workers. Hypocrisy rarely has been so expensive.

5) Former official of Screen Actors Guild benefit plan files complaint against SAG benefit plan bosses. Actors who belong to SAG have gotten a rude set of revelations over the last several months: The people in charge of their health and pension funds are in it for the money. Last September a recently terminated SAG benefits official, Craig Simmons, filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor that it investigate plan managers for fraud, excessive compensation and other acts of malfeasance totaling anywhere from $5 million to $10 million. The likely culprits are SAG benefits plan CEO Bruce Dow and his cronies. Simmons and lately various SAG members are accusing Dow of whitewashing facts and blocking outside probes. Hopefully, this movie will have a happy ending.

4) Public-sector unions lead Wisconsin legislature shutdown. The unprecedented occupation of the Wisconsin State Capitol and surrounding area, far from being a spontaneous happening, was well-planned and coordinated. And it was state and local affiliates of AFSCME and teachers unions who provided the main guidance for this paramilitary campaign to turn the city of Madison into a virtual combat zone. All Democratic state senators, as an act of solidarity, absconded town and decamped to undisclosed locations in order to block a quorum necessary for action on new Republican Governor Scott Walker’s budget proposals to close a two-year $3.6 billion deficit. The Battle of Wisconsin, in a sense, marked a new chapter in union aggression, going well beyond the strike as a tool to advance employee interests. And thanks to a union-dominated recall campaign, Walker’s tenure in office remains in the balance.

3) SEIU anti-corporate radical activism continues. Andrew Stern resigned the presidency of the Service Employees International Union more than a year and a half ago, but the union under successor Mary Kay Henry continues to set the gold standard for labor radicalism. In 2011 the union, which now claims more than 2 million members, among other activities, stepped up its corporate campaign against Sodexo until slapped with a racketeering suit by the company, organized and endorsed “Occupy” rallies in cities throughout the nation, worked with a reconstituted ACORN chapter to invade a Southern California bank, and played a key role in the ongoing recall effort of Governor Walker in Wisconsin. In other words, the SEIU is being its usual self.

2) National Labor Relations Board serves as union advocate. Facing a clear Republican majority in the House and a significantly reduced Democratic majority in the Senate, organized labor last year found itself relying heavily on the executive branch to realize tangible gains. It knew it had an ally in the NLRB. The board, among other things, ruled in favor of unions in a ”successor bar” case; established a rule shortening the time elapse between a petition filing for representation and a worker vote; and most dramatically, sided with the Machinists union’s attempt to block production of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner jumbo jet at a second, nonunion plant in South Carolina. The board called off the dogs in December only because the international union and the company had just reached an agreement favorable to the union. As long as Obama, or any other Democrat, is president, more actions like these are likely.

1) FBI arrests 11 in probe of $1 billion+ Long Island Rail Road disability scheme. Since the late Nineties a thousand or more retired LIRR workers have known how to boost their income on the sly: Declare themselves “disabled.” And they did it by visiting doctors with a reputation for manufacturing phony medical histories. FBI and New York State law enforcement agents, following a three-year probe, this past October arrested nearly a dozen persons, including a former United Transportation Union local president. But the damage has been done and may continue. A federal agency, the Railroad Retirement Board, may be on the hook for at least $1 billion in long-term payments if it can’t declare beneficiaries ineligible. That the scam occurred and continued for so long owed largely to lavish benefit packages negotiated by various unions representing LIRR workers.

(Dis)honorable mention. Florida IBEW local benefits manager Gregory Sims sentenced for $800,000 embezzlement; Cincinnati public employees boss Diana Frey charged, pleads guilty to $750,000 embezzlement; Melissa King, benefits manager of New York City Laborers local, pleads guilty to theft, but denies she took the alleged $40 million; NYC ballet dancers union representative Leonard Leibowitz indicted, pleads guilty to $350,000 theft; Pittsburgh-area Iron Workers bookkeeper Jennine Prince indicted, pleads guilty to $400,000+ theft; Mia Garza, California SEIU health care local benefits clerk, sentenced for $1 million+ theft; ILWU workers riot at Washington State rail terminal to block grain shipment; Michigan Plumbers secretary April Franklin sentenced for stealing more than $400,000 from union; Louisiana-based Laborers benefits manager Theresa Waters pleads guilty to nearly $500,000 embezzlement; builders trade association boss Joseph Olivieri sentenced for role in $10 million NYC-area Carpenters benefit scam; SEIU and Teamsters-affiliated City of New York snow removal crews likely engaged in post-blizzard work slowdown as political payback; NYC-area bus drivers union boss Warren Annunziata sentenced for extorting $500,000 from bus companies; Wayne Mitchell, president of Communications Workers of America (CWA)-affiliated newspapers mailroom employees local in New York, sentenced for embezzlement; Puerto Rican sugar workers union boss pleads guilty to $450,000 in thefts; Montana Plumbers local secretary Teresa Wilson pleads guilty to stealing about $200,000; civil turmoil at Verizon employees CWA Local 1101 in New York takes new turn; Florida CWA local secretary-treasurer James Drury pleads guilty, sentenced for $300,000+ embezzlement; business agents of New Jersey Iron Workers, Laborers locals arrested for bribe-taking, while son of the Iron Workers agent pleads guilty to $560,000 theft.

Lawmakers want to “Go Big”

Posted by BA Team On January - 19 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

The last year or so has been a roller coaster experience for lawmakers pushing for a plan to reduce the deficit by at least $4 trillion over the next ten years. The approach that is commonly called “Going Big” aims to go above and beyond what they see as less impactful reductions in the country’s long-term deficit.

Originally the effort was spearheaded by a presidential commission chaired by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson. Following their lead, a group of Senators formed a bipartisan “Gang of Six.” The fall, of course, brought the ill-fated supercommittee. Now, the latest embodiment of the go big approach to hit the news cycle is the “Go Big Coalition.” The group is comprised of more that 150 members of Congress and was recently spurred into action by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s call to end the “happy talk” on deficit reduction.

Roll Call explains:

Reid said late last year that if the bipartisan “gang of six” Senators working on a deficit reduction plan had a proposal, “put it in bill form, in writing — not all these happy statements on what people think can be done.”

The Go Big Coalition is working on developing a bill based on the Bowles-Simpson plan that contained roughly the targeted $4 trillion in deficit reduction.

Rep. Mike Simpson, the key Republican member of the coalition recognized the group has some significant hurdles to clear. “The biggest advantage that the super committee had was that they were guaranteed to get something on the floor. Somehow we want to maintain that,” he said. “The question is, even if we come up with a codified Simpson-Bowles, can we get it on the floor?”

With the country suffering from the unfortunate habit of running trillions in annual deficits, any deficit reduction plan must consist of significant spending reforms. So while the plan’s likelihood of success hinges on its contents, it’s promising to see such a large group of lawmakers taking a serious approach to deficit reduction.

State News Roundup

Posted by BA Team On January - 19 - 2012 ADD COMMENTS

The latest count of the number of people seeking unemployment benefits provided a welcome bit of good news for a struggling economy. Jobless claims dropped to 352,000 last week, the lowest mark since April 2008. The Associated Press continues, “the four-week average, which smooths out fluctuations, dropped to 379,000. That’s the second-lowest such figure in more than three years.” When examining the state-by-state breakdown, Wisconsin experienced the biggest decrease in new claims (-7,657) and New York saw the largest increase in claims (29,389) – due primarily to layoffs in transportation, education, and construction.

Newt Gingrich set off a firestorm of criticism when he said he would do away with “truly stupid” child labor laws. However, according to BusinessWeek, Wisconsin and Maine were already implementing such changes, which have also sparked controversy. Now 16-and 17-year-olds in Wisconsin will be able to work longer hours, following reforms in child labor laws. Wisconsin youth are no longer restricted to a 26-hour work week, the previous limit under old child labor laws.  In Maine, Republican State Senator Debra Plowman and State Representative David Burns sponsored a bill allowing 16-and 17-year-olds to work 32 hours per week, up from 20 hours, for a rate of $5.25 an hour, $2.25 less than the state’s minimum wage.

A lack of confidence in big economies like China and Europe is good news for U.S. auto sales, which analysts and executives project will grow four to nine percent in 2012, according to Reuters.  U.S. automakers General Motors, Ford and Chrysler took the market share in the U.S. for the first time in 23 years.  However, Citigroup U.S. auto analyst Italy Michaeli only forecasted 13.9 million in U.S. sales for 2012, below the 17 million sales averaged before 2008.

WASHINGTON – President Obama yesterday rejected for now the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline, saying the $7 billion project could not be adequately reviewed by the 60-day deadline set by Congress. While the president’s action does not preclude later approval of the project, it sets up a fight over energy, jobs, and regulation that will likely persist through the November election.

The president said his hand had been forced by Republicans in Congress, who inserted a provision in the temporary payroll tax cut bill passed in December giving the administration 60 days to decide the fate of the 1,700-mile pipeline from oil sands in Alberta, Canada, to refineries on the Gulf Coast.

The State Department, which has authority over the project because it crosses an international border, said there was not enough time to draw a new route for the pipeline and assess the potential environmental harm along its path. The agency recommended that the permit be denied, and Obama concurred.

“As the State Department made clear last month,’’ the president said in a statement, “the rushed and arbitrary deadline insisted on by congressional Republicans prevented a full assessment of the pipeline’s impact.’’

Obama said that his action was not a final judgment on the merits of the project.

The trans-border pipeline has become a political flashpoint, with proponents saying it will create thousands of jobs and help wean the nation off Middle Eastern oil, while opponents charge that it furthers dependence on dirty fuels, contributes to global warming, and threatens ecological disaster.

Canada’s prime minister, Stephen Harper, a strong advocate of the pipeline, told Obama yesterday that he was profoundly disappointed in the decision.

Brendan Buck, the spokesman for House Speaker John A. Boehner, said: “President Obama is about to destroy tens of thousands of American jobs and sell American energy security to the Chinese. The president won’t stand up to his political base even to create American jobs.’’

TransCanada, the company proposing to build the pipeline, said that it would quickly apply for a new permit to build along a similar route.

Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, has asserted that much of the oil would be exported after being refined in the United States and therefore would not enhance US energy security.

“The United States shouldn’t be used as a middleman between the dirtiest Canadian oil and the thirstiest foreign markets,’’ he said.

Bill McKibben, who has been arrested several times for protests against the pipeline, said that the decision is a rare case in which “scientists have been smiling and Big Oil scowling.’’

“It wasn’t just the right decision by the president, who listened to scientists and average citizens; it was also a brave decision,’’ said McKibben, an author who was born in Lexington, Mass., and lives in Vermont and teaches at Middlebury College.

Michael Bailey of Globe staff contributed to this report

    Copyright (c) GoodPorkBadPork 2009-2013, Some Rights Reserved, Best viewed at 1024x768 or higher